An AI HR assistant for a small firm answers the questions staff ask all day, how much leave do I have, how do I claim expenses, what is the policy on X, from the firm’s own handbook and policies with the source shown; drafts onboarding packs, offer letters and standard correspondence from templates; and chases the documents new starters owe. It runs on a business plan or a built knowledge assistant under a data processing agreement, with access limited to policies and the individual’s own records. What it must never do is decide about an individual (hiring, discipline, grading, dismissal), give legal advice, or read personal or special-category records beyond what the question needs. Those are the lines the ICO’s employment guidance and the Equality Act draw, and an assistant that respects them saves an HR person or an office manager hours a week at a cost of seats or a first implementation at £4,000 to £15,000.
- Answers
- Policy questions, with the source shown
- Drafts
- Onboarding, letters, chasers
- Never
- Decides about a person or advises on law
What it does
Policy questions: the assistant reads the staff handbook, the policies and the procedures, answers in plain English with the paragraph it relied on, and says “ask HR” when the handbook does not cover it. Onboarding: from a template and the new starter’s details, it drafts the offer letter, the welcome pack, the first-week plan and the list of documents to collect, and chases the ones that do not arrive. Correspondence: reference requests, standard letters, meeting invitations, drafted for a person to check and send. Meeting notes for one-to-ones and reviews, within the transcription rules. Each is reading and drafting; none is deciding.
RelatedA knowledge assistant on your own documents AI meeting notes and transcription: the UK rules Fixed-price AI automation for UK SMEs
The lines it must not cross
Decisions about individuals: who to interview, who to promote, whose performance is poor, who to dismiss. Under Articles 22A to 22D a significant automated decision needs safeguards, and the ICO’s 2026 recruitment findings expect meaningful human involvement, bias testing and a route to challenge; the practical rule for a small firm is that the assistant never scores, ranks or recommends about a named person. Legal advice: the assistant explains the firm’s policy, not employment law, and says so. Data: it reads the handbook and, when asked by an individual, that individual’s own leave balance or record, never another person’s, and never health, disciplinary or grievance files unless a specific process with a DPIA allows it.
The set-up
Two routes. Inside a business plan, a shared project or custom GPT with the handbook and policies attached answers questions for staff at the cost of seats, with the permissions of the plan; it suits a firm whose handbook is current and whose questions are mostly policy. A built knowledge assistant on the API, integrated with the HR system for leave balances and documents, with sources shown, access scoped per user and an audit trail, is a first implementation at £4,000 to £15,000; it suits a firm that wants the assistant to answer “how much leave do I have” from the system rather than “here is the leave policy”. Either way the handbook has to be true first: an assistant over an out-of-date handbook confidently gives out-of-date answers.
RelatedClaude Team plan for a UK business AI acceptable-use policy template
The rules to write down
Seven lines, adopted before go-live and kept with the policy.
- 01
The assistant answers from the handbook and policies; anything it cannot find goes to a named person
- 02
It never scores, ranks, recommends or decides about a named individual
- 03
It explains policy, not law, and says so
- 04
It reads an individual’s own record only for that individual, and never health, disciplinary or grievance files outside a DPIA-covered process
- 05
Drafts are checked by a person before they are sent
- 06
Conversations have a retention period and are not used for performance management
- 07
The handbook is reviewed before go-live and every six months
What to measure
Questions answered without escalation, questions escalated, hours saved by the person who used to answer them, time to complete onboarding paperwork, and a monthly sample of fifty answers checked against the handbook. If the sample shows wrong answers, the handbook is usually the cause.
RelatedHow to measure AI return in 90 days How to check AI output before you rely on it
Common questions
Can AI answer HR questions from our staff handbook?
Yes, grounded in the handbook and policies with the source paragraph shown, escalating what it cannot find. The handbook must be current first.
Can an AI HR assistant make decisions about staff?
No. It must not score, rank, recommend or decide about a named individual. Significant automated decisions need the Articles 22A to 22D safeguards and the ICO expects meaningful human involvement.
Is an AI HR assistant GDPR compliant?
On a business plan or the API under a data processing agreement, with access scoped to policies and an individual’s own record, a retention period, and a DPIA where sensitive files are involved, yes.
What does an AI HR assistant cost?
Seats only inside a business plan for policy questions; £4,000 to £15,000 fixed for a built assistant integrated with the HR system and scoped per user.
Can it draft offer letters and onboarding packs?
Yes, from templates and the starter’s details, for a person to check and send. It can also chase the documents that do not arrive.
Should it give employment law advice?
No. It explains the firm’s policy and says that it is not legal advice. Legal questions go to a person or an adviser.